« Once | Main | Saturdays »

June 15, 2007

Something There is That Doesn't Love a Wall-A Photo in Catapult

deleted.jpg

Part of me wanted to not create my customary post about having a photo published in Catapult. However, that would rather have gone against the spirit of the issue [Deleted for Inappropriate Subject Matter]. Indeed, I believe the subject matter of the three main articles, sexuality, should not be deleted, but rather needs to be discussed more. I appreciate many of the questions that Barbara Zielinski brings up in her feature article and even some of her framing of the topic, yet I must add that I do not agree with her central premise. I do commend to you Kirstin Vander Giessen-Reitsma's fine editorial on our cultural poverty in the area of conversing with strangers and overcoming the taboo of breaking the silence in public.

I do also have a picture in the issue, picturing a word that, coincidently, pretty well captures the issue's theme.

You are invited to discuss these issues on the Catapult web site, and we can certainly have a smaller discussion here as well, if you like.

Here is my previous work in the magazine.

Catapult | By jackdas | 10:16 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://stlouisblogs.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/938

Comments

Another example why, at least I'm convinced as much, our vigilance as Christians should be directed within not without. Too bad no sharing here of Ms. Zielinski's discussion re Christian carnality with say, her daughter, husband, mother, father,... Like the old Marxists use to say, a velvet revolution is preferable to bloodshed.

Posted by: Publius at June 15, 2007 11:01 AM

I liked the David Scherer quote: “As sexual beings, our creativity and passion are not separate from the mystical or contemplative, but expressions of the mutual interpenetration, co-equality and co-intimacy that exist between spirit and body…sexual love can be viewed as a type of infused contemplation. Here there is fusion—an intimate dance of spirit and body… Whether sexual intimacy is lived out through physical intercourse, spiritual love, or unimagined expressions of human creativity, it overflows from our core of goodness and generosity in loving imitation of how God loves. “
I was particularly interested in what was meant by “sexual energy” I remember Jacob telling me that some celibate Monks found that they could use their “sexual energy” to serve God more fully, but I not sure I get it. I know marriage (and I suppose I should also say committed sexual relationships in general) require a lot of energy; energy that is not required when you’re single. But, as far as the energy, I’m not sure if I would call it “sexual energy” or just energy in general. Jacob, said the monk gave some interesting examples; I think I’ll ask him about it tonight. Personally, as a woman I find that men and woman bring different “energy” to relationships and I wouldn’t necessarily say it’s sexual, but I’m sure sexuality plays into it somehow. Being a bit of a tomboy back in the day I found most my buddies were boys; I was surely not aware of sexual energy but then again sex was not as interesting as climbing trees.

Posted by: Heidi Vincent at June 15, 2007 12:33 PM

First, let me note that I have entered the fray, or, rather more accurately, started the fray, here:

http://www.cultureisnotoptional.com/discuss/viewtopic.php?t=1371&s=catapult

I pray that that dicussion may be good. Quite nervous about it really.

Heidi, I like that quote too. Though, I might nuance this statement a bit "our core of goodness and generosity in loving imitation of how God loves." I do believe that we have some common grace type of goodness in us, but I think that part of our problem in this area is that that fundamentally our core is not good. Sadly, even the redeemed, and presumably progressively becoming more holy core of believers does not seem to be making much of a difference in this area.

Oh, and we singles may not require energy in maintaining sexual relationships, but we sure do in simply dealing with our sexuality, or perhaps perseverance is the more apt term. Oh, and we also need energy for getting to the point where sexual relationship may indeed even be a possibility (i.e. i.e. marriage ;)

Posted by: Neil E. Das at June 15, 2007 1:42 PM

Perserverance. True enough!

Posted by: Heidi Vincent at June 15, 2007 1:54 PM

Email "Something There is That Doesn't Love a Wall-A Photo in Catapult" to a friend!

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):