« Friends, Met and Unmet | Main | The Last Bits of the Anti-Americanism Series from the BBC »
April 22, 2007
My Favorite Times of the Week
You know I think I have posted about this topic before, but it is certainly worth repeating. Very often, my favorite times of the week are just after both church and house church. The reasons for my joy are similar but not identical, as is the tenor of the joys.
My church is not perfect. In my opinion, it is not even currently fully filling one of its founding mandates of being a truly multi-cultural church. I think we need to have a black pastor and more black leadership for that to really be true. And yet, sitting in church today and looking at the diversity that exists was truly amazing. Sometimes I get rather blase about it and take it all for granted, but it is a truly remarkable thing, as is the fact that we get consistent hardcore messages encouraging us to sacrifical living (which are nested in grace I should add) and the place continues to be full and grow. Go figure. And they are tough messages. I might have an occassional theological fine point to argue sometimes or grumble with the implications of the sermon for my life, which happens more often, but, wow, there are not many other places you are going to get that combination.
I could go on about what I would like in church (a little more of the creeds and confession and...ok I can't think of a third "c") but that is not something I dwell upon, not when there are other things to be about. The combination of all the things my church offers may not be for everyone, but its voice and the emphases it focuses upon are worthy of wider hearing and consideration.
Ah, I digress. My favorite part of chuch is at the end. And not just because, "Whew, we finally get to go home," though that thought does occur from time to time. No, I dig it because after praise and prayers and a challenging sermon, we generally get either a more traditional hymn (today it was "O Sacred Head Now Wounded") or a more reflective contemporary song or spiritual, which matches my worship temperament better, though I can dig the rocking songs sometime too.
And then we get to have communion. If it were a meal, would this be the main course or would it be the sermon? The Protestants will tell you the latter; the Catholics the former. I am very close to going with the Catholics on this one. Both are sacraments, though, even in the Protestant formulation, and so impart grace. And the thought of having grace imparted to me in a tangible way, that really does something to me body, mind, and spirit excites me.
We have communion in a massive circle, so it can potentially be a little distracting, but the beauty is that no one really cares how you do it. And, though I rather like the concept of everyone doing things the same way at the same time and could be perfectly happy in a more liturgical church, I do take the advantage of the freedom to create my own ritual. Now that sounds terribly postmodern in one way, but I do not think my little rituals are counter to scripture or much tradition, so I think I am OK. They are not even that demonstrative. There are times when I really want to cross myself either during or after communion, but I haven't gotten up the courage to do that as yet.
And then after grace has been imparted to us in a touchable, chewable form, we get the benediction. I think it means the "good word." We don't always get a formal one, but I dig it when we do. Did you know that only an ordained elder can actually give a benedition in the PCA? I know to some that might sound horribly Catholic and not very priesthood of believerish, but, yes, I like it very much, to be blest by those who have been placed in spiritual authority over me. Bring it on. We can and should bless one an another as friends and family members, perhaps by placing our hands on someone's head even, but that does not perclude there being a different type of blessing from an elder. Check out the end of the book of James for a model of both of these things in the discussion concerning the person who is sick.
One part of my rituals, such as they are, that I will tell you about is that I like to cup my hands at this point, as if receiving a gift. Cheesy? Perhaps, but it encodes what is happing for me. I would even like being given the communion bread and wine if possible. If I ever have the opportunity to suggest things to a congregation in the future I might suggest some of these at the least, perhaps, as occassional practices. I may even suggest opening our mouths during parts of the service to symbolize tasting the Lord or receiving his word. Yeah, I bet the kids will love that.
No, I also like this time because I am anticipating fellowship with my friends and perhaps with new friends, because very often we will be eating together and enjoying one another's company and silly jokes in a very short while.
As for the second time of the week after house church, well the order of things is reversed a bit, as is their ecclesiastical weight. There are no official sacraments, for example. First, we eat in a weekly potluck that may feature any number of dishes from vegan to totally carnivorous. And the fellowship is even better than the food. Then we sing and study and pray. And I like the studying because, yes, I often lead it, and that is also one of my favorite things to do. And the prayer is great, because we break into gendered groups and can really deeply pray for one another (except when my Elder Eddie and Andy and I and are figuring out which old school choruses we all know and singing snippets of them rather loudly). At the end of house church, sometimes I am as giddy as a schoolgirl. What I really want to know though is, are schoolgirls really giddy, and, if so, why? OK, so perhaps I am not as giddy as all that, but I can get as silly as I do with my family, well, because I suppose that is who I am with.
OK, I did not intend to go that long....back to the Aeneid, which, I might add, is really good, classic even. Maybe there is something to this "classics" business.
Finally, blessings for the week upon you all.
Church Life and Theology | By jackdas | 10:43 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://stlouisblogs.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/886
Comments
nicely put, pastor das.
i like the new layout and photos.
Posted by: ange at April 22, 2007 11:24 PM
Giddy? Maybe. I think the better word for me as a schoolgirl is hyper.
Face it, us kids have lots of energy.
No afternoon nap for me, nope.
Posted by: Susie Schoolgirl at April 22, 2007 11:58 PM
Oh, Angela you must be mistaking me with that other Das brother over in Godfrey ;)
Thanks, though. I am pleased with the layout too, though I need to get another "links" sign that has "One Way" the right way up. I was actually trying to play off on the German for "left."
Posted by: Neil E. Das at April 23, 2007 8:56 AM
Why thank you, Suzie Schoolgirl. I don't understand the nuances between giddy and hyper, though. So perhaps an essay is in order, you know, compare and contrast, thesis, intro, body paragraphs, conclusion.
Posted by: Neil E. Das at April 23, 2007 8:58 AM
Thanks for the blessing Neil.
It’s refreshing to hear you appreciate ritual too. Along those lines, I hope you have the courage to cross yourself before, during, or after taking communion. I don't think it's my Catholicism speaking when I say that it strikes me as a natural gesture (although I don’t do it at Newcity). I think your right, taking communion is a transforming, renewing practice and not something to be taken lightly whether you believe in transubstantiation or not: "For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy manner eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the Lord's body." (1 Corinthians 11:29) Nothing light about that.
Sometimes when I'm harboring unforgiveness or some other muck I don't take it. It's weird to let it pass by in protestant churches but during mass it was much more acceptable.
P.S. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not milling the cracker around to see if it’s getting fleshy like I once used to; I’m just saying that it’s good to be reminded that taking communion’s a serious and renewing practice.
Posted by: Heidi Vincent at April 23, 2007 10:28 AM
"Sometimes when I'm harboring unforgiveness or some other muck I don't take it." Ditto. And, yes, it is a bit weird to let it pass in a Protestant church, both because people may well wonder what's up (and if it is the right person asking, that's OK too) and because we maybe have too easy of benchmark for receiving forgiveness as Protestants sometimes.
Please don't misinterpret that, folks. I am not advocating penance, but sometimes perhaps we have too quick an attitude to receiving forgiveness and moving on. The issue of receiving communion or not when I am black with sin is a tricky one. I try to guage whether my heart is truly repentant and broken. If it is, I think it is entirely appropriate to receive. Sometimes, though, if I am really a mess, I want to confess to a brother of elder and have them pray for me first and then come back to communion the following week, not because I cannot pray on my own and receive forgiveness, but because I may just need it that way. Again, the end of James.
And, Heidi, you are too funny...watching to see if the cracker gets fleshy. Ah, but that is another discussion altogether, one that I only know a little about just now.
Posted by: Neil E. Das at April 23, 2007 10:55 AM
If I could pick something to improve upon at church, and the list isn't very long mind you, I would have us all eat the bread and drink the wine at the same time, rather than doing it as it is passed (or shortly thereafter).
I'm not sure exactly what I think about abstaining from Communion for personal sins... I had always thought that if you knew you had an unrepented sin that you were still struggling with it was better to abstain. But then a pastor (at a different church) encouraged all Christians to take Communion, admonishing us that if we think we're doing God a favor by abstaining, then we are denying the power of this Sacrament in our lives and forgetting that we will all live with sin, repented and unrepented, until Christ's return. So, now I'm not so sure anymore.
Posted by: Renae at April 23, 2007 6:00 PM
Gosh, as music director for Neil's church I feel a little funny about making any comment on this thread, but here goes. Neil, recognizing that artists tend to be "thin-skinned", I will ignore the little voice in my head that wants to be offended that you don't find our church services to be the flawless earthly manifestation of worship. In fact, I could probably make a longer list than anybody of all the things that I would change or add or get rid of in our services. So I will refrain from sharing any of that, and will just add this: everyone who walks into the doors of New City Fellowship has to sacrifice something to worship there. You could probably say that about any church, but it is escpecially true of a multi-cultural chuch. This is an encouraging thought to me when I start to become aware of a way that we are failing to realize our vision (like the lack of a African American pastor). (by the way, I keep telling God that He needs to fix that problem for us, but He just doesn't seem to want to listen.) So, anyway, I'm really glad that you are part of our church despite the fact that it doesn't perfectly jive with your personal preferances and convictions about worship. Honestly, I wonder a lot of times why anyone stays at our church. It is really encouraging for me to know that it is one of your favorite times of the week, even if it is too rockin' sometimes.
Posted by: kirk at April 23, 2007 8:44 PM
You are right, Kirk, it is amazing to me too that anyone attends our church at all, because one does have to give up something to come. I am hoping in heaven that we can all take turns and participate fully in each other's worship styles and really understand, truly get how it works for the other person, and then blend them all together again like we do at New City.
The lovely thing is that our church does not take the lowest common denominator approach and make things insipid, but rather multiplies the strengths of everyone while having Chirst as the true denominator.
Also, my post really wasn't meant to suggest actual changes to the church, at least not all the things I mentioned in my post that I said I like. If I had to pick one thing, I think it would be a moment for confession (sometimes corporate) or reflection somewhere in the service. I was simply stating my preferences. Nothing moves me quite the way an old school hymn can, perhaps for reasons which may not even be all that spiritual (familiarity, comfort, nostalgia, etc.) but also for many that are spiritual. Also, I do not despise the "rocking songs" at all. I can be and have been quite moved by them to glorify God. I have come on a bit of journey, though, to expand my horizon of just what type of music may be appropriate in church. More important than the type of music played, though (and I don't think any type of music can work), is the manner in which it is played and the way in which the congregation is encouraged to worship. And I have absolutely no complaints there, my friend.
Posted by: Neil E. Das at April 24, 2007 9:03 AM
Renae, I was at one point rather used to taking the elements together as well, and there is certainly some symbolic power to that.
And, I can get the notion of taking communion no matter what in one sense. I suppose the key verses are I Cor. 1:27-32:
27Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. 28A man ought to examine himself before he eats of the bread and drinks of the cup. 29For anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself. 30That is why many among you are weak and sick, and a number of you have fallen asleep. 31But if we judged ourselves, we would not come under judgment. 32When we are judged by the Lord, we are being disciplined so that we will not be condemned with the world.
I suppose the key is "without recognizing the body of the Lord." I am not sure what that means really. It doesn't seem to fit with having unpentent sin, but more with a complete disregard for what is happening in communion. It seems as if the Corinthian communion meals were actual meals in which some people perhaps ate and drank to excess even, and so did not even stop think what they were about. I am not sure about that, though.
Our notion of not participating in communion because of unrepentant might come from other places then or from principles about the Lord not hearing our prayers when we have sin in our hearts or the prominence of confession in the Lord's prayer (though it is not at the beginning of the prayer). I don't really know, so I am going to shut up now.
Posted by: Neil E. Das at April 24, 2007 9:21 AM
Hey brother, great pics on the side! I espicaly like the email one. :)
Love you man,
Posted by: Lloyd at April 24, 2007 12:19 PM
Thanks, brother. Yeah, I like it too, even if it is a cheesy self-portrait.
Posted by: Neil E. Das at April 24, 2007 3:03 PM